Is your brand a luxury brand?

As little as a 5-6 years ago, computers and cell phones were purely utilitarian devices. That is, they were used to get tasks done. They weren't always very pretty to look at and certainly not things that you necessarily craved - unless your inner geek needed whatever was the latest and greatest technology. "Sexy" was certainly not a word ever used to describe the latest Dell, Motorola phone, or the newest desktop from HP.

Then Apple managed to change the world. Most people think that Apple's great innovation was the invention of the portable mp3 player.  Far from it. Plenty of others existed when the iPod  came along. What Apple focused on was design - the design of the software that ran on the iPod, the industrial design of the actual device,  and the simplicity of a single ecosystem for managing your music and getting it onto your device.

Even at the time the iPod first launched, it did less than it's competitors. It had fewer features yet it was more expensive than almost anything else out there. Even today, the current crop of iPods still does much less in raw functionality than alternative players. And yet, they still cost more.

What Apple knew was that customers craved simplicity and would be willing to pay for a device that looked cool. People could show off the fact that they owned an iPod with the (now ubiquitous) white headphones even when the device was in their pocket. If it cost a little bit more, that would make it slightly exclusive as it would scare away the bargain hunters and the pure feature geeks.

Apple created an accessible luxury. Something that cost a little more, something that customers craved. This started  mostly in the form of iPods, but now comes  in the form of subsidized iPhones and is extending to the iPad (although the iPad is priced to be a little more exclusive and not as affordable to the general populace).

Apple's computers are truly heading into "luxury" territory. The least expensive MacBook is $1,000, yet I can go down to my local "big-box" store and get a reasonable laptop for $300. I know - these two computers can't be compared in terms of quality, bundled software, processor speed, etc. I'm simply pointing out that the price of admission into the cult-of-mac is quite a bit higher than the cost of entry into the general world of laptop computing. When you open up your MacBook in the local Starbucks, everyone knows that your computer is a "premium" computer and not just some run-of-the-mill Dell.

Which brings me to my real point: What's so great about being a luxury brand?

First of all, you're protected from feature or performance competition. To compete, you need better style, perhaps better quality, and certainly better customer service. The experience of purchasing a luxury brand needs to be top quality from your initial shopping experience to customer support, but you don't necessarily need to compete on core features. Often times, less is actually more.

Second, you don't have to compete on price so your margins can be big.  In fact, you better have a premium price to substantiate your premium brand. Not only do you have a premium price, but you need to make sure that your products aren't offered in discount locations that can't support your entire brand experience. What this generally means is that you get to command higher margins than your competition and hopefully reap the profits at the end of the day. Luxury products tend to be highly profitable.

Third, your market is slightly more affluent than the target markets of other brands. Your customer is able to spend a little more to get a product that they can show off. This segment of the market is a little more resilient to economic ups and downs and will be able to spend money with you even when the economy tightens up.

Here's where Apple has had a brilliant strategy: not everyone can afford their higher-end computers, but they have plenty of "affordable luxury" products so that you can get a piece of the brand without having to pay thousands of dollars. This is equivalent to Coach selling slightly less expensive handbags or Dolce & Gabbana selling sunglasses for around  $100. Customers get to get a taste of a luxury brand at a reasonable price. Everyone likes to spoil themselves now and again with a little luxury and affordable luxuries can have great appeal. Witness the explosion of cupcake shops that sell the tiny cakes for $3 and up at huge profits!

The one potential issue with being a luxury brand is that you might have to give up the low end of the market in order to succeed. Back again to Apple, it appears that they might do this with both the iPad and the iPhone as Android phones and tablets  take over in terms of sheer volume. My guess is that Apple will stick with their high-end, luxury strategy and let the rest of the market be owned by someone else. They'll stick to their high-margin products for the top end of the market and let others fight it out to claim the rest of the market with low margins and tough price competition.

So, how can you make your own brand a luxury brand? Can you update the experience of shopping in your store or on your website? How do you make your product or service worth paying a little extra for?

Here are a few tips:

1. Extraordinary customer service. Make doing business with you a better experience than anywhere else.

2. Extraordinary product quality. Your product doesn't need to do more than the next guy's. It just needs to do the basics better.

3. Exclusivity. An endless supply of your product usually means that anyone can get it. You need to figure out a way to make your product or your service slightly scarce. Make it worth lining up for.

Is your brand a luxury brand? Can it be one?

How to compete with Wal-Mart

WSJ's Independant Street blog has an interesting post today about what small businesses can do to survive when Wal-Mart comes to town. The data shows that if businesses try to compete on price, they loose.  Small biz just can't beat Wal-Mart at the game that they own and have perfected over the decades.

What small business CAN do is differentiate:

1. Better service. Who gets great service at Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Best Buy or any other big box store? Small businesses can differentiate by providing exceptional customer service. By doing this, prices can be kept high and possibly even be raised. Better service will also drive customer loyalty and referred business.
   
   
2. Unique products. Wal-Mart and other big box stores only cary mainstream products. Local stores can differentiate by providing products that will never be available at the big box stores.
   
   
3. Focus. Wal-Mart excels at providing something for everyone. What they don't excel at is deep focus in single product categories. Small businesses should look to find a specific niche and become experts at servicing that niche. In this case, less is more - a very different strategy than Wal-Mart's "more is more" strategy.

I'm sure there are plenty of other ways to compete against Wal-Mart. What are yours?

Where are Borders and B&N in the ebook game?

I have to admit, I'm drooling over the new Kindle from Amazon. I wasn't that interested in the first version, but this second edition looks like it has fixed a lot of the issues. I still wish it had backlighting, though. Having to clip on a normal book light to read at night seems a little kludgy.

That's why I'm very excited about the forthcoming ebook reader for the iPhone from Shortcovers. I know there are other ebook readers for the iphone out there, but this will be one of the first ones connected to a large library of ebooks for purchase. In fact, you can even buy one chapter at a time in a "pay as you read" model.

But, my real question in all of this is why are Borders and Barnes & Noble not in this market? They ceeded the online book sales market to Amazon in the 90s. Now they're going to miss the boat on digital distribution as well. Amazon knows full well (and I believe this too) that physical books are going to be sold less and less over the next decade. E-ink and flexible displays are going to make book and newspaper reading an entirely digital experience. It's really just a matter of time.

So, if Borders and Barnes & Noble want to survive, they should be working with their publishing contacts (the same ones Amazon has) to build a digital book marketplace. They should hire some iPhone developers and put together a great ebook reader application. If they don't, they will become dinasours and miss this market completely. They don't need to go the hardware route as Amazon has done. Afterall, that is expensive and time consuming. Instead, they should work with the hardware platforms that are in millions of pockets already - iphones, blackberries, etc.

As I write this, I think about Tim's post today about Netflix and how much guts (and smarts) it takes to work on a new busienss model that destroys your old one. This is what Borders and B&N need to do to survive.

Design Patterns

User interface design has always been one of my passions and I enjoy checking out new design resources as I stumble accross them.

Today, Cale pointed me towards Quince, a "UX Patterns Explorer." This very cool Silverlight application allows you to search through design solutions to data sorting and navigation. While not every solution is perfect, it's a great resource to explore options as you are developing your own web sites and applications.

92% of Americans Employed

I'm usually a glass-half-empty kind of person. I can't help it, but I'm generally a pessimist.

But, right now I'm a firm believer that one of the only ways we as Americans can help lead ourselves out of our financial crisis is to be optimists. As Aaron Patzer points out in his guest post on TechCrunch today, Americans (who use Mint.com) are spending an average of $400/month less. Of course, layoffs aren't helping. But, the fact remains that 92% of Americans have their jobs still. Many of these people haven't even taken any pay cuts. They are just spending less - maybe out of fear of what's to come, acknowledgment that they should have been saving more in the past, or just from a lack of optimism.

I'm not an economist (far from it) but it seems pretty clear that the country could start turning itself around if the 92% of employed Americans simply started spending again - maybe not all of the $400/month they aren't spending now, but how about half of that. Of course, in the long term Americans need to have better savings habits, but now is not the time to go that route. We need money flowing through our economy and getting average Americans to spend is one of the best ways to do that.

In fact, Finland is on the cutting edge of this scenario. They are running a national ad campaign that encourages people to start spending. Read more about that story at NPR.org.

Free webinar on simple marketing tactics

John Jantsch of Duct Tape Marketing fame will be giving a free webinar on Simple Marketing Tactics on February 11, 2009 at 12:00pm CST.

"Let's get back to basics and start utilizing simple, effective and affordable marketing tactics to create momentum that carries your business through the tough times and allows it soar in the good times."

Reserve your spot today!

Fail Gracefully

Tim Berry's blog post today on "failing forward" reminded me of one of my favorite engineering/application design phrases: fail gracefully.

What does this mean? It means that you should design your applications and web sites to provide the end user with useful and informative information when it runs into a problem. Failing gracefully means:

• Providing useful 404 pages on your web site
• Not displaying only error codes when your application crashes. Provide information that will help the user fix the problem.
• Not letting engineers write your error messages. (see point 2)
  
• Making sure errors behind the scenes don't bring everything else to a screeching halt

Beyond writing code and developing applications, the "fail gracefully"concept is useful in business. This means:

• Having good backup plans if things don't go as you originally planned.
• Knowing what your alternatives are.
• Planning ahead for optimistic and pessimistic scenarios
• Learning from your mistakes

Not that any of us ever want to fail, but it's inevitable in business, entrepreneurship and life. So, failing gracefully is a much better option than just failing.